Dev Builds » 20180304-1555

You are viewing an old NCM Stockfish dev build test. You may find the most recent dev build tests using Stockfish 15 as the baseline here.

Use this dev build

NCM plays each Stockfish dev build 20,000 times against Stockfish 14. This yields an approximate Elo difference and establishes confidence in the strength of the dev builds.

Summary

Host Duration Avg Base NPS Games WLD Standard Elo Ptnml(0-2) Gamepair Elo

Test Detail

ID Host Base NPS Games WLD Standard Elo Ptnml(0-2) Gamepair Elo CLI PGN

Commit

Commit ID 450f04969c5699fb9a4b39b883c2f37d122de290
Author Stefano Cardanobile
Date 2018-03-04 15:55:58 UTC
Using a S-curve for the optimism measure Add a logarithmic term in the optimism computation, increase the maximal optimism and lower the contempt offset. This increases the dynamics of the optimism aspects, giving a boost for balanced positions without skewing too much on unbalanced positions (but this version will enter panic mode faster than previous master when behind, trying to draw faster when slightly behind). This helps, since optimism is in general a good thing, for instance at LTC, but too high optimism rapidly contaminates play. passed STC: LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00] Total: 159343 W: 34489 L: 33588 D: 91266 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5a8db9340ebc590297cc85b6 passed LTC: LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00] Total: 47491 W: 7825 L: 7517 D: 32149 http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5a9456a80ebc590297cc8a89 It must be mentioned that a version of the PR with contempt 0 did not pass STC [0,5]. The version in the patch, which uses default contempt 12, was found to be as strong as current master on different matches against SF7 and SF8, both at STC and LTC. One drawback maybe is that it raises the draw rate in self-play from 56% to 59%, giving a little bit less sensitivity for SF developpers to find evaluation improvements by selfplay tests in fishtest. Possible further work: • tune the values accurately, while keeping in mind the drawrate issue • check whether it is possible to remove linear and offset term • try to simplify the S-shape curve Bench: 5934644
Copyright 2011–2024 Next Chess Move LLC